This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 27, 2012

Risk to children no longer hypothetical

A reader responds to "Order opening dependency courts: Nothing new except procedure."

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

In "Order opening dependency courts: Nothing new except procedure," (March 21), Robert Fellmeth and Ed Howard of the Child Advocacy Institute state that the blanket order opening Los Angeles dependency courts to the press and public is "child centered" and that it "does not do anything new." Really? First, this is the same team that supported the blanket order by filing a letter that deprecates abused child victims by classifyi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up