The appellate justice engaged plaintiff-petitioner's counsel in lively but unenlightening dialog about a challenging insurance issue. The opposing lawyer approached the lectern with a chance to score points. The justice posed the question that vexed petitioner. The opposing lawyer retorted that the question was compound and ill-conceived, but he would get to it after making some more important points.
I am not making this up. Counsel's objection portended an execrable argument. He...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In