This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Dec. 11, 2013

Fed up with this derision of the bench

Judges may not be fed up with insulting, discourteous, obdurate or offensively familiar counsel, but I am.

Charles A. Bird

See more...

The appellate justice engaged plaintiff-petitioner's counsel in lively but unenlightening dialog about a challenging insurance issue. The opposing lawyer approached the lectern with a chance to score points. The justice posed the question that vexed petitioner. The opposing lawyer retorted that the question was compound and ill-conceived, but he would get to it after making some more important points.

I am not making this up. Counsel's objection portended an execrable argument. He...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up