This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Corporate

May 8, 2015

Fee-shifting bylaws a hurdle for shareholder-plaintiffs

A recent Delaware Supreme Court decision, in conjunction with California broad exceptions to the internal affairs doctrine, may change the landscape of shareholder litigation in California. By Serge V. Pavluk and Katie McKitterick


By Serge V. Pavluk and Katie McKitterick


A recent Delaware Supreme Court decision, in conjunction with California broad exceptions
to the internal affairs doctrine, may change the legal landscape of shareholder litigation
in California.


In ATP Tour Inc. et al v. Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A.3d 554 (Del. 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court upheld a Delaware corporation's
ability ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up