Letter to the Editor
May 5, 2015
LETTER: Article on blogging makes missteps
The author says, "[I]f a blogger receives a 'takedown notice,' the blogger can respond by taking down an image, limiting copyright damages to actual damages that can be proven." This is incorrect in several ways. By David L. Amkraut
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
The entertaining article "Professor confronts perils of blogging" (April 17) contains some serious errors.
The author states, "[I]f a blogger receives a [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] 'takedown notice,' the blogger can respond by taking down an image, limiting copyright damages to actual damages that can be proven." This is incorrect in several ways. Wher...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In