This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Litigation

May 2, 2015

Weighing risks, benefits of juror questioning

The practice of jurors questioning witnesses dates back to common law, but it is undergoing a revival of sorts. The trend has been on legal minds since Ellen Pao's failed gender discrimination lawsuit against her former employer.


By Phil Johnson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Jeremy Pasternak's heart leapt into his throat. Moments earlier, the San Francisco
attorney's client, a woman alleging workplace harassment, finished undergoing cross-examination.
All trial, Pasternak worried about one question, which - if asked - could leave his
client vulnerable to criticism. The opposing attorney never brought up the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up