Real Estate/Development
Aug. 6, 2002
Court Complains of Case-Law Confusion
LOS ANGELES - Case law about who can be held liable for conspiracy to breach fiduciary duty is not as clear as it could be, a state appellate court said Friday, in an opinion that invited the Supreme Court to step in and review the issue.
"We see fruit salad where there should be separate stacks of apples and oranges," Justice Miriam Vogel wrote for the 2nd District Court o...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In