This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Apr. 15, 2008

Fee-Falling

Focus Column - By Ken Moscaret - Some policyholder coverage litigators are unaware that Brandt fee awards depend on whether plaintiff's counsel worked on an hourly or contingency fee basis, Ken Moscaret writes.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Ken Moscaret
This article appears on Page 7

      Every policyholder coverage litigator in California knows that a policyholder is entitled to recover some attorney fees under Brandt v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813 (1985), after winning a "bad faith" lawsuit against an insurance carrier. What they may not realize, though, is that since Cassim v. Allstate Insurance Co., 33 Cal.4...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up