By Anat Rubin
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 1
Parties entering into arbitration cannot, under federal law, agree to expand the limited role of the courts in reviewing the results, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
But the justices raised the possibility that parties could look to state statutes or common law to give the courts a great...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 1
Parties entering into arbitration cannot, under federal law, agree to expand the limited role of the courts in reviewing the results, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
But the justices raised the possibility that parties could look to state statutes or common law to give the courts a great...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In