Family
Nov. 20, 1999
District Attorneys Using Information Protected by State
By Jeffrey A. Lowe In an attempt to go after deadbeat dads, the district attorney is using a recently enacted state statute that requires California banks, thrifts, credit unions and life insurers to turn over confidential information about their customers to the Franchise Tax Board. This new state statute is Orwellian in scope and must be challenged as unconstitutional.
By Jeffrey A. Lowe
In an attempt to go after deadbeat dads, the district attorney is using a recently enacted state statute that requires California banks, thrifts, credit unions and life insurers to turn over confidential information about their customers to the Franchise Tax Board. This new state statute is Orwellian in scope and must be challenged as unconstitutional...
In an attempt to go after deadbeat dads, the district attorney is using a recently enacted state statute that requires California banks, thrifts, credit unions and life insurers to turn over confidential information about their customers to the Franchise Tax Board. This new state statute is Orwellian in scope and must be challenged as unconstitutional...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In