Judges and Judiciary
Oct. 27, 1999
Toward a Unified Effort
By Rudolph R. Loncke Seldom does a trial judge have reason to criticize, in writing, the opinion of an appellate court justice. On matters involving interpretation of the law, trial court judges are required to follow the law as dictated by a higher court decision, though we may believe that the appellate decision is unwise, wrong or ill-reasoned.
By Rudolph R. Loncke
Seldom does a trial judge have reason to criticize, in writing, the opinion of an appellate court justice. On matters involving interpretation of the law, trial court judges are required to follow the law as dictated by a higher court decision, though we may believe that the appellate decision is unwise,...
Seldom does a trial judge have reason to criticize, in writing, the opinion of an appellate court justice. On matters involving interpretation of the law, trial court judges are required to follow the law as dictated by a higher court decision, though we may believe that the appellate decision is unwise,...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In