Constitutional Law
Jul. 2, 2015
The chains of doctrine
The majority's approach in a recent First Amendment case, doctrinally correct as it is, leads to quite absurd results. By Ashutosh Bhagwat
On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona. While the Reed decision has been overshadowed since then by bigger things (i.e., Obamacare and same-sex
marriage), it is in fact a very interesting decision in what it reveals about the
role of the Supreme Court.
The subject of the Reed case is signs. Like many towns, Gilbert regul...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In