This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Dec. 25, 2014

(Mis)remembering sexual assault

Rolling Stone's controversal report on rape at the University of Virginia warrants a discussion on the difference between lying and errors in memory. By Rebecca Hofstein Grady and Elizabeth Loftus


By Rebecca Hofstein Grady and Elizabeth Loftus


Last month, Rolling Stone published a searing report on campus rape, and the story and its aftermath have dominated the media's attention and scrutiny. While the case has become a lightning rod for political debate, ripe with opinionated commentary from many angles, few have looked for what psychological science can tell us about it. In addition to understanding how memory errors can come about, it is critical to...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up