This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 18, 2014

At high court, a pregnant pause

Employers have long known it is unlawful to discriminate against an employee because they are pregnant under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. But what qualifies as discrimination? By Camille A. Olson and Edward C. Young


By Camille A. Olson and Edward C. Young


For nearly 40 years, employers have known that it is unlawful to discriminate against an employee because they are pregnant under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. What has been a relatively straightforward law has recently captured the attention of interest groups, including anti-abortion groups, women's rights organizations, labor unions, as well as the business community at large.


The sudden interest is du...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up