This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

May 9, 2012

When the client is an absent class, expenses can run high

Fee and expense applications have come under scrutiny after a judge threatened sanctions against a San Diego firm. But experts say there are few guidelines for approving firms' request and judges have the final say.


By Gabe Friedman


Daily Journal Staff Writer


After seven years of litigating a case against Apollo Group Inc. for allegedly misleading investors, the class members won a $145 million settlement - until their lawyers took home more than a third of the sum.


An Arizona federal judge approved that $50 million payday for securities firm Barrack, Rodos & Bacine last month.


The size of the legal fees raised some eyebrows - one objector ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up