This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

California Supreme Court

May 3, 2012

Habeas attorneys argue against sanctions in death penalty case

The justices late last month directed attorneys James S. Thomson and Peter Giannini to be ready to argue whether financial sanctions could be imposed on lawyers "who file an abusive petition with this court."


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye tried to lower the tension at the state Supreme Court Tuesday as 40 habeas lawyers and supporters in the spectator seats awaited a hearing on sanctioning a colleague.


She made it clear there would be no sanctions imposed immediately, announcing that the court will order further briefing and defer submission of the case that provoked a furor in the ha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up