Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - Robert A. Van Nest, a partner at Keker & Van Nest LLP, seemed to be playing to multiple audiences Monday when he delivered Google Inc.'s closing argument as the company defends itself against copyright infringement claims by Oracle Corp..
Van Nest was, of course, trying to persuade the jury that Google should not be held liable for infringing the structure, sequence and organ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In