This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

May 1, 2012

Divided by a common language: Brinker vs. Wal-Mart, Pt. 2

California focuses on a comparative approach to class certification instead of simply whether there are common questions "central" to the case. By Brad Seligman of Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson PC

Administration Building

Brad S. Seligman

Supervising Judge

Civil Direct Calendar


By Brad Seligman


Uncommon Commonality


The central issue in most class certification motions is whether there are issues common to all class members sufficient to justify class treatment. This requirement, referred to in the lawyer coined term "commonality," is used in both California and federal class action cases, but with differing meanings. Under the Federal Rules, commonality is a prerequisite for all class actions, which must show that &q...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails