This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Apr. 27, 2012

Judicial Paternalism and the wage class action

Brinker seems to suggest that courts should "protect" employers by ignoring the merits of a claim when certifying a class. By Brian Sinclair of Rutan & Tucker LLP

Brian C. Sinclair


By Brian Sinclair


Having defended dozens of employers against hundreds of wage-and-hour class actions, I have never had one tell me that it preferred that the case proceed as a class action. I also have not had one employer tell me that it thought the class action procedure was fair or beneficial. Therefore, I was concerned by a passage in the recently published Brinker case that plaintiffs may attempt to exploit in class action certification proceedings. ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails