This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 26, 2012

Rethinking associate classes

In the current environment, JD year no longer accurately indicates a particular level of expertise or professional development. By Valerie Fontaine of Seltzer Fontaine Beckwith


By Valerie Fontaine


Traditions and habits are hard to break, even when they're outmoded.


The overwhelming number of law firm partners involved in associate hiring say they value skill and experience over how many years the lawyer has been practicing law. Yet most law firms, unlike nearly every other business, categorize associates by JD graduation year rather than level of expertise for purposes of hiring, compensation, and promotion. Until recently...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up