Criminal
Apr. 25, 2012
Prosecutors claim Baker & McKenzie partner has conflict in criminal case
A well-known Baker & McKenzie LLP attorney may have a conflict of interest requiring him to recuse himself from defending a man charged criminally in connection with an illegal Internet pharmacy, prosecutors say.




Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - A well-known Baker & McKenzie LLP attorney may have a conflict of interest in defending a man charged in connection with an Internet pharmacy scheme, prosecutors said Friday in a court filing.
Prosecutors told a Northern District judge that Baker & McKenzie partner Robert W. Tarun witnessed conduct related to the charges in the indictment against defendant Daniel "D.J.&quo...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In