This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Apr. 21, 2012

Plaintiffs' bar plots strategy after lunch break decision

Plaintiffs' lawyers who've digested the state Supreme Court's recent opinion on meal-and-rest break class actions say that as long as employers choose to work at the periphery of the law, they will continue to file lawsuits.


By Brian Sumers


Daily Journal Staff Writer


When the state Supreme Court released its long-awaited opinion last week in a pivotal meal-and-rest break case, representatives for employers rejoiced, saying it offers a road map for how to avoid class actions.


All they must do - they say - is institute a clear policy permitting most workers to take a meal break during the first five hours of their shift and allowing two rest breaks during a six- to ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up