This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 30, 2007

Less of a Disadvantage

Forum Column — By Michael Waterstone — We should applaud the Supreme Court’s ruling letting parents represent their disabled children in federal education-rights cases. But we should have a better system of providing lawyers to parents who cannot afford them.

FORUM COLUMN

By Michael Waterstone

      Imagine that your child has a disability. Because of this disability, he needs extra services at the local public school. Federal law, you are fairly certain, requires that the school provide these services. But the district refuses.
      Imagine that you are not a lawyer and that paying an attorney is out of the question for you. Even if you prevail in your ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up