This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 30, 2007

Protecting Service Providers

Focus Column – By Rachael Samberg and Brian W. Carver – Wielding the hammer of free speech, the 9th Circuit used a case brought by an adult Web site to clarify notice-and-takedown provisions in federal Internet law.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Rachael Samberg and Brian W. Carver

      You may have heard about Viacom's $1 billion complaint that YouTube failed to take "reasonable precautions to deter rampant infringement on its site" by failing to remove infringing third-party content.
      YouTube, as an online service provider, may argue for immunity from liability under the safe harbors of the Digital Millennium Copyri...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up