INSIGHT COLUMN
By Elizabeth Lake and Peter Landreth
On April 1, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-awaited decision in Entergy v. Riverkeeper. Although early reports declared the decision a victory for power plants over fish, it is premature to make that call, especially because the Obama administration is now responsible for issuing new federal regulations in the wake of the decision, and because in California, momentum continues to line up agains...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



