This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 23, 2009

Do Clouds Remain After the 'Pacific Sunwear' Decision?

A case involving a California retailer clarified the rules regarding indemnification and patent infringement, write Stephen P. Swinton and Charles S. Evendorff.

INSIGHT COLUMN

By Stephen P. Swinton and Charles S. Evendorff

Our patent system was intended to provide coverage for anything under the sun made by man. Yet, in comparison to that seemingly boundless breadth, ask any buyer who has sought indemnification for a patent infringement claim, and you likely will hear of an even more expansive scope of potential defenses against indemnification. Fortunately, in Pacific Sunwear of California v. Olaes Enterprises Inc.,...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up