By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer Public officials can use taxpayer money, although with some limits, to inform voters about the effects of ballot measures without improperly influencing the outcome of the election, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday. In an important case for local governments, the high court spelled out how to tell the difference between unbiased information about a measure and blatant campaign material. Vargas ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer Public officials can use taxpayer money, although with some limits, to inform voters about the effects of ballot measures without improperly influencing the outcome of the election, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday. In an important case for local governments, the high court spelled out how to tell the difference between unbiased information about a measure and blatant campaign material. Vargas ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



