This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Mar. 31, 2000

SISTER

FORUM The Violence Against Women Act should be upheld by the Supreme Court as a valid exercise of Congess's Commerce Clause power. Page 6. By Erwin Chemerinsky

Erwin Chemerinsky

Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law

Erwin's most recent book is "Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism." He is also the author of "Closing the Courthouse," (Yale University Press 2017).

By Erwin Chemerinsky
        After conducting extensive hearings over four years, Congress concluded that state law remedies often are inadequate in rape and domestic violence cases. Based on this legislative history, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 13981. The act contains provisions designed to better handle the problem of gender-motivated violence, inclu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)