This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Dec. 9, 2008

Final Examination

A recent 9th Circuit decision illustrates that persuading the Court of Appeals to intercede in ongoing trial court proceedings is no easy task, write James C. Martin and Zareh A. Jaltorossian. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By James C. Martin and Zareh A. Jaltorossian

Most litigants need not worry about filing an appeal until their case is over and there is a final judgment disposing of all the claims in the action. And, ordinarily, an appeal is possible in state or federal court only after the district court enters final judgment - the so-called "one final judgment rule." But parties often face adverse interlocutory rulings they cannot live with...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up