This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Nov. 26, 2008

Reading the Fine Print

A non-signatory to a contract containing an arbitration provision is normally not bound to arbitrate its dispute, but in certain cases, the non-signatory plaintiff can be bound, writes Peter S. Selvin. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By Peter S. Selvin

Because arbitration is a matter of contract, a non-signatory to a contract containing an arbitration provision is normally not bound to arbitrate its dispute. Grundstad v. Ritt, 106 F.3d 201 (7th Cir. 1997). Nevertheless, where a signatory to such an agreement is related to the non-signatory plaintiff, the non-signatory plaintiff can be bound. This article discusses two such instances - where there is an agen...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up