This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Jun. 11, 2005

Court's Ruling May Increase In-Camera 'Pitchess' Reviews

Focus Column - Criminal Law - By Ray Jurado - Recently, the California Supreme Court clarified that case law had set too high a standard for in-camera review of officers' personnel records in criminal cases. By filing what is commonly referred to as a Pitchess motion, named after the seminal case of Pitchess v. Superior Court , 11 Cal.3d 531 (1974) (holding that a defendant could compel discovery of relevant information in officer personnel files by showing it was material to his defense), a

        
        Focus Column
        
        Criminal Law
        
        By Ray Jurado
   ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up