This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 19, 2013

Missed the statute of limitations?

The error can very consequential, but missing a statute of limitations in and of itself does not necessarily equal malpractice liability. By J. Randolph Evans, Shari L. Klevens and Suzanne Y. Badawi


By J. Randolph Evans, Shari L. Klevens and Suzanne Y. Badawi


One of the most common errors that litigation attorneys make is missing statutes of limitations. This error can be very consequential because the client can sue the attorney for legal malpractice and potentially recover as damages everything the client would have recovered from the third party had the lawsuit been filed timely. The damage potential can be in the millions. But missing a statute of limita...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up