Litigation
Oct. 17, 2013
Defense attorneys in antitrust trial claim customers weren't harmed
During closing arguments, government attorneys called the customers "cherrypicked" and instead focused on the documents written between executives and employees at Bazaarvoice Inc. before its acquisition of ratings agency PowerReviews Inc.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - In the closing arguments of a case testing whether the merger of two top competitors in the ratings and reviews market violated antitrust laws, defense attorneys asked a federal judge Tuesday to give weight to the many customers who testified that their businesses are unharmed.
Government attorneys called the customers "cherry-picked" and instead focused on the documents ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In