This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Mar. 5, 2003

Nothing Substitutes for an Expert's Practical Experience

Focus Column - Legal Malpractice - By Alec H. Boyd - In negligence and breach-of-fiduciary-duty cases arising from an attorney's rendering of professional services, the standard of care against which the attorney's services are measured is normally a matter peculiarly within the knowledge of experts. As a general rule, only expert testimony can prove the standard of care and the ethical obligations to which the attorney must be held. Unigard Ins. Group. v. O'Flaherty & Belgum.

        Focus Column
        
        Legal Malpractice

        By Alec H. Boyd
        
        In negligence and breach-of-fiduciary-duty cases arising from an attorney...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails