This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Public Interest

Oct. 8, 2010

Fee Awards Questioned

A personal stake in the outcome of a case shouldn't prevent a litigant from getting attorney fees as long as the case also results in a larger public benefit, the California Supreme Court suggested at oral argument Wednesday.

By Laura Ernde

Daily Journal Staff Writer

A personal stake in the outcome of a case shouldn't prevent a litigant from getting attorney fees as long as the case also results in a larger public benefit, the California Supreme Court suggested at oral argument Wednesday.

The Private Attorney General Act of 2004 was designed to encourage lawyers to take public interest cases pro bono by giving them a chance to get paid if they w...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up