This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Corporate

Oct. 1, 2010

Determining Triggers: Duty to Defend or to Indemnify

A landmark case on indemnity agreements gives new meaning to the scope of work documents and negotiation history, especially for architects and engineers, by Jim Murphy of Murtaugh, Meyer, Nelson & Treglia.

By Jim Murphy

Crawford v. Weather Shield, 2008 DJDAR 11114, California's leading case on the duty to defend contained in indemnity agreements, is unambiguous as to when this duty is triggered. Crawford provides for a broader obligation to defend than the related duty to indemnify; and circumstances obviating the duty to indemnify are not determinative of the duty to defend. This was made clear in both Crawford and UDC-Universal...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up