This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 25, 2010

Exposed: Communications Between In-House Counsel and Company

Affirmative steps companies should take to preserve the confidentiality of legal advice, by David H. Evans, Christopher Cusmano and Richard Oliver of Chadbourne & Parke.

By David H. Evans, Christopher Cusmano and Richard Oliver

In a Sept. 14, 2010 decision, the Court of Justice of the European Union reaffirmed that for the purposes of a European Commission competition investigation, legal professional privilege does not extend to communications between a company and its in-house counsel. The Court held that because in-house counsel are fundamentally different from external lawyers, and are not sufficiently independent in ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up