By David Skinner
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, some have argued that legislators have not taken sufficient action to prevent future eminent domain abuses, particularly in California. In Kelo, a 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court upheld New London's use of eminent domain to acquire Susette Kelo's home for an economic revitalization project by a private developer. That project has since fallen through, and Pfizer...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In