Litigation
Sep. 5, 2013
Justice challenges anti-moonlighting ruling
Arthur Gilbert is appealing a ruling in which a trial court judge said that he would not be allowed to take a state job before the end of his term.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
An appellate justice who sued the state over an anti-moonlighting provision and lost has decided to challenge the decision. Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert of Division 6 of the 2nd District Court of Appeal, in Ventura, has said he would like to step down from the bench before his term ends in 2019. Gilbert would like to take another state job, but a rule bars judges from doing so before their term ends, ev...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In