This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Sep. 5, 2013

Justice challenges anti-moonlighting ruling

Arthur Gilbert is appealing a ruling in which a trial court judge said that he would not be allowed to take a state job before the end of his term.


By Chase Scheinbaum


Daily Journal Staff Writer


An appellate justice who sued the state over an anti-moonlighting provision and lost has decided to challenge the decision. Presiding Justice Arthur Gilbert of Division 6 of the 2nd District Court of Appeal, in Ventura, has said he would like to step down from the bench before his term ends in 2019. Gilbert would like to take another state job, but a rule bars judges from doing so before their term ends, ev...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up