LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
The article "After a Brutal Start, Chief Justice Assumes 'Affirmative Posture'" (Aug. 21) makes it appear as if the chief justice presumes employing interpreters in civil cases is a good use of public funds. If that is the case, I suggest we have a chief justice who does not understand how to properly allocate scarce tax dollars! The Constitution has been interpreted to require interpreters in criminal cases because of t...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In