Perspective
Nov. 19, 2013
9th Circuit speaks (twice) on arbitration agreements
The same 9th Circuit panel recently issued a pair of decisions that reached very different results on whether to enforce arbitration agreements. By Andrew J. Pincus and Archis A. Parasharami
Three weeks ago, the same 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel issued a pair of unanimous decisions that reached very different results on whether to enforce arbitration agreements. The first decision, Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, 2013 DJDAR 14344 (Oct. 28, 2013), upheld the arbitration agreement, declaring that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California rule that purports to exempt certain claim...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In