By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Law firms can be disqualified from lawsuits for having unfair inside knowledge about the enemy.
But a state appellate court ruled Wednesday that even in a case that looks questionable on the surface - involving one of San Francisco's most prestigious law firms - there should be no disqualification if there's no proof of secret information-sharing...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Law firms can be disqualified from lawsuits for having unfair inside knowledge about the enemy.
But a state appellate court ruled Wednesday that even in a case that looks questionable on the surface - involving one of San Francisco's most prestigious law firms - there should be no disqualification if there's no proof of secret information-sharing...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In