U.S. Supreme Court,
Securities,
Government,
Corporate,
Administrative/Regulatory
Dec. 9, 2016
Insider trading questions remain
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated insider trading decision, the first time the court has addressed insider trading in nearly two decades.
Thomas A. Zaccaro
Senior Counsel
Hueston Hennigan LLP
Phone: (213) 788-4039
Email: tzaccaro@hueston.com
Boston College Law School
Thomas is a partner in the firm's Litigation Department. He served as regional trial counsel in the SEC's Los Angeles office.
Nicolas Morgan
Partner
Paul Hastings LLP
Phone: (213) 683-6181
Email: nicolasmorgan@paulhastings.com
Nicolas is a partner in the firm's Litigation Department. He served as senior trial counsel in the SEC's Los Angeles office.
Jenifer Q Doan
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated insider trading decision in Salman v. United States, 2016 DJDAR 12012 (Dec. 6, 2016), the first time the Supreme Court has addressed insider trading in nearly two decades. While the court had the opportunity to clarify murky areas of existing judicial interpretation of insider trading liability in the tipping context, its decision was relatively narrow and simply confirmed its prior articulation of tipper liability i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In