U.S. Supreme Court,
Criminal,
Constitutional Law
Jul. 7, 2016
Doctrinal synergy
Does 1 + 1 = 3? In math, never. In the law, sometimes. A case in point is Utah v. Strieff.
2nd Appellate District, Division 5
Brian M. Hoffstadt
Presiding Justice
California Court of Appeal
UCLA School of Law, 1995
Does 1 + 1 = 3? In math, never. In the law, sometimes.
A case in point is Utah v. Strieff, 2016 DJDAR 5919 (June 20, 2016). There, a police officer illegally detained Edward Strieff outside of a suspected drug house, learned he had an outstanding traffic warrant, arrested him, and found methamphetamine on him during a search incident to that arrest. The U.S. Supreme Court took the case to decide whether the drugs were subject to suppression as the "fruit" o...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In