This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 30, 2016

High court rejects the rigidity of Federal Circuit rulings

One of the overarching themes to the Supreme Court's review of Federal Circuit cases in the last 15 years is that the Federal Circuit is fond of bright-line rules, the Supreme Court likes discretion and case-by-case examinations of the facts. By Michael Feldman and Mark A. Lemley

Michael Feldman

See more...

By Michael Feldman and Mark A. Lemley

For over a decade, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - and patent law - have had a hard time at the Supreme Court. The court regularly reverses the Federal Circuit, almost always replacing a pro-patent Federal Circuit decision with a Supreme Court decision less friendly to patentees. From this perspective, the Supreme Court's recent decision in Stryker v. Zimmer and Halo v. Pulse...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up