Law Practice
Jun. 22, 2016
Why we should keep a unified bar
Deunification proponents are long on bluster and short on common sense and reasoned analysis. By Paul J. Riehle
Paul J. Riehle
Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLPEmail: paul.riehle@faegredrinker.com
UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA
On June 9, the Council of State Bar Sections met about the issue of deunification, which is primarily whether the bar's voluntary sections should remain under the ambit of the bar. All but one of the sections voted to remain unified with the bar with two sections not having yet taken a vote. Of the 14 sections that have voted, 13 voted to remain unified, with nine doing so unanimously, including my section - Antitrust, Unfair Com...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In