This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Sep. 6, 2014

Brady's California blind spot

When it comes to impeachment material in police personnel files, even well-meaning prosecutors may be unable to carry out their Brady disclosure obligations. By Jonathan Abel


By Jonathan Abel


In 2012, Daryl Lee Johnson was arrested for felony domestic violence. The two arresting officers - key witnesses in the case against him - had more than 500 pages of potentially impeaching evidence, or Brady material, in their personnel files. San Francisco prosecutors knew of this evidence because judges had reviewed it "in camera" and ordered it disclosed in numerous prior cases involving the officers. But in Johnson's case...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up