This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Aug. 28, 2014

Victoria's Secret worker suit shines spotlight on employee shift rules

An Irvine-based plaintiff's attorney said the retailer also dodged California's requirement to pay workers additional wages when shortening shifts.


By Laura Hautala


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Mayra Casas claims she was cheated by her boss's system for keeping labor costs low. If sales slumped at the Victoria's Secret outlet at the Puente Hills Mall where she worked, she got sent home. That much is legal, but Casas and her lawyer, Louis M. Marlin of Marlin & Saltzman LLP in Irvine, said the retailer also dodged California's requirement to pay workers additional wages when shortening ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up