Litigation
Aug. 28, 2014
Victoria's Secret worker suit shines spotlight on employee shift rules
An Irvine-based plaintiff's attorney said the retailer also dodged California's requirement to pay workers additional wages when shortening shifts.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Mayra Casas claims she was cheated by her boss's system for keeping labor costs low. If sales slumped at the Victoria's Secret outlet at the Puente Hills Mall where she worked, she got sent home. That much is legal, but Casas and her lawyer, Louis M. Marlin of Marlin & Saltzman LLP in Irvine, said the retailer also dodged California's requirement to pay workers additional wages when shortening ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In