This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Aug. 16, 2014

Post-arrest silence can be used against defendant, state high court rules

The state Supreme Court ruled 4-3 on Thursday that a person involved in a serious car accident can be convicted based in part on his failure to inquire about the well-being of the people in the other car.


By Emily Green


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - The state Supreme Court ruled 4-3 on Thursday that a person involved in a serious car accident can be convicted based in part on his failure to inquire about the well-being of the people in the other car.


The ruling says a defendant's silence can be used against him during the time between his arrest and the police informing him that he has a right to remain silent.


The ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up