This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Constitutional Law

Aug. 15, 2014

Sterling ruling a blow to free speech

Although no civil right is absolute, if you asked the average American whether or not it is lawful or moral to take a person's property away from them for something they said, the answer would be no. By Michael Acker


By Michael Acker


Although no recognized civil right is absolute in the United States, if you asked the average American on the street whether or not it is lawful or moral to take a person's property away from them for something they said, the answer would be no, and potentially unanimous.


But that is exactly what happened to former Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling on Tuesday. Using the rarely employed "extraordinary procedure" (<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up