Criminal
Apr. 3, 2013
High court fails to grasp forensic evidence
A recent state Supreme Court case showcases numerous errors in judicial interpretation regarding egregious forensic errors that led to Richards' conviction for murder in 1997. By C. Michael Bowers
A recent state Supreme Court case, In re William Richards, S189275, showcases numerous errors in judicial interpretation regarding egregious forensic errors that led to Richards' conviction for murder in 1997. The court's misstatements on forensic scientific validity (i.e., "what is 'false' science?"), its minimization of the degrading effect bad forensics had on the jury's deliberations, and its restricti...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In